To be impossible taking into consideration the records of this congressional debates that result in the use of this norm, when the objective to restrict domestic partnerships to heterosexual relationships is quite clear (Supremo Tribunal Federal, note 24, pp. 92-3).
The main reason she considers the literal interpretation for this norm to be inadmissible is the fact that Constitution needs to be grasped as being a whole that is harmonious. Minister Carmen Lucia claims: “Once the right to freedom is granted … it is important to make sure the alternative of really working out it. It could make no feeling if similar Constitution that establishes the right to freedom and forbids camrabbit webcams discrimination … would contradictorily avoid its workout by publishing people who wish to work out their straight to make free individual alternatives to prejudice that is social discrimination” (Supremo Tribunal Federal, note 24, pp. 91-4). Continue reading “Other justices, such as for instance Minister Carmen Lucia, acknowledge this argument”